Legal Opinion
Ferrostaal Corp. v. M v. Singa Wilguard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1993No. 90 Civ. 6340 (BN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NEWMAN, Senior Judge: 1
Ferrostaal Corporation, the consignee of a shipment of hot rolled steel rail from Duisburg, Germany, brings this action against defendants pursuant to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 1300 et seq. (1988). The cargo had been ordered from Ferrostaal by the New York City Transit Authority (“NYCTA”), and was shipped aboard the M/V SINGA WIL-GUARD, departing Antwerp, Belgium on September 16, 1989 and arriving at Newark, New Jersey on October 5, 1989. Ferrostaal seeks to recover $159,680.15, plus…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- The Niel MaerskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Vana Trading Co. v. S.S. METTE SKOUCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- American Tobacco Co. v. the Katingo HadjipateraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ETS Gustave Brunet, S.A. v. M.V. "Nedlloyd Rosario"District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Sogem-Afrimet, Inc. v. M/V IKAN SELAYANGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- R.B.K. Argentina S.A. v. M/V Dr. Juan B. AlberdiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996