Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1993No. 2493 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Claimant Rudolph Goldberg appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referee’s decision directing the claimant to reimburse Girard Provision Company, the insurance carrier of the claimant’s employer, the amount of its subrogation lien for worker’s compensation benefits the insurer had paid the claimant. The referee also ordered the claimant to pay the insurer the interest that had accrued on the disputed amount of the lien that had been held in escrow.

*561 Issues

Under section 319 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Associated Hospital Service v. PustilnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Anderson v. Greenville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Associated Hosp. Serv. of Phil. v. PustilnikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Warner Lambert Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. BushKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Serrano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. BushKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API