Legal Opinion
Ronning v. Thompson
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Loren N. Brown, J.
By notice of petition, and petitions with exhibits, the petitioners seek a judgment directing the respondent to approve the petitioners’ site plan and preliminary subdivision for the development of lands in the Town of Bolton (Town) entitled Bell Harbour I-A, and Bell Harbour III, directing that the Town of Bolton Planning Board has no jurisdiction over the review of the projects as subdivisions, and striking that portion of the subdivision regulation defining a condominium as a subdivision. The petitions are opposed in all respects.
These petitions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kamhi v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McGillicuddy v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Delaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Delaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- McGillicuddy v. MonaghanNew York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ferrigan v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Esposito v. Town of Fulton Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992