Legal Opinion
Huntington National Bank v. Rose (In Re Rose)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 25, 1984No. Bankruptcy 3-83-02179(A)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLES A. ANDERSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Huntington National Bank [Huntington] objected on October 21, 1983, to the confirmation of the Chapter 13 debtors’ proposed Plan, alleging that the Plan had not been proposed in good faith, as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3). Upon an Amended Complaint filed January 11, 1984 the matter was heard on March 13, 1984.
Huntington and debtors, Dennis L. Rose and Diane Rose, have been parties to several loan transactions, with the same loan officer representing Huntington throughout. It appears that all but the two most recent loans were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Memphis Bank & Trust Company v. Linda Gail WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Kull (In Re Kull)District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
- In Re William J. Hines and Patricia Hines, Debtors. Appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Ohio, Ohio Student Loan Commission v. Willis (In Re Willis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- St. Luke Parish Federal Credit Union v. Wourms (In Re Wourms)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miami Valley Production Credit Ass'n v. Klipfer (In Re Klipfer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986