Reavis v. Solminski
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
551 N.W.2d 528 (1996)
250 Neb. 711
Mary REAVIS, Appellee and Cross-appellant,
v.
James SOLMINSKI, D.D.S., Appellant and Cross-appellee.
No. S-94-288.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
August 9, 1996.
Michael J. Mooney and Susan E. Norris, of Gross & Welch, P.C., Omaha, for appellant.
Thom K. Cope, of Bailey, Polsky, Cope, Knapp & Nelson, Lincoln, for appellee.
WHITE, C.J., and CAPORALE, FAHRNBRUCH, LANPHIER, WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, and GERRARD, JJ.
LANPHIER, Justice.
Alleging she was sexually assaulted, Mary Reavis filed a civil action against the alleged attacker, James Slominski, D.D.S. The petition stated two…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Caporale; Dissent · Wright.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.