Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pittman v. City of Taylor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1976No. 54854, (Calendar No. 5)Published

1ConcurrenceWilliams, J.

I concur with my brother the Chief Justice as follows:

1) Maki terminated existing statutory governmental immunity.

2) This Court was therefore free under common-law principles to continue or abrogate common-law governmental immunity. I agree with the abrogation of common-law immunity for this case, pending cases in which the point was made and preserved, and prospectively from this decision as to common-law governmental immunity.

Whether, however, there should be any governmental immunity and, if so, to what extent, is in the jurisdiction of the Legislature. The Legislature in its wisdom may or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Myers v. Genesee County AuditorMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Negri v. SlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API