Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentCanady, J.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the challenged statutory provisions violate the right to privacy and the right of access to courts protected by the Florida Constitution. I would also réject Weaver’s argument that the statutory provisions unconstitutionally encroach on this Court’s rulemaking authority and constitute a prohibited special law. The First District correctly concluded that the statutory provisions withstood the constitutional challenges made by Weaver. I therefore dissent from the majority’s unwarranted interference with the Legislature’s authority.
I. RIGHT TO…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kukral v. MekrasSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Acosta v. RichterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.