Legal Opinion · Dissent

Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 9, 2017No. SC15-1538Published

1DissentCanady, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the challenged statutory provisions violate the right to privacy and the right of access to courts protected by the Florida Constitution. I would also réject Weaver’s argument that the statutory provisions unconstitutionally encroach on this Court’s rulemaking authority and constitute a prohibited special law. The First District correctly concluded that the statutory provisions withstood the constitutional challenges made by Weaver. I therefore dissent from the majority’s unwarranted interference with the Legislature’s authority.

I. RIGHT TO…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kukral v. MekrasSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Acosta v. RichterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API