Legal Opinion

Glascock v. City Nat. Bank of West Virginia

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2002No. 30595PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRAW, Justice.

Appellants William and Karen Glascock challenge the lower court’s award of summary judgment in favor of appellee City National Bank (successor in interest to Blue Ridge Bank). Appellants entered into a loan agreement with the bank for a construction loan. Appellants alleged that they were damaged by the bank’s failure to disclose an unfavorable home inspection report. The lower court granted the bank’s motion for summaiy judgement on the basis that the bank simply had no duty to disclose the unfavorable report. Because we find under the particular facts of this case that a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Aikens v. DebowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. AAMG Construction Lending CenterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Miralles v. SnoderlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McFarland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
  4. Tillette v. Beneficial West Virginia, Inc. (In re Tillette)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
  5. Phillip Alig v. Quicken Loans Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API