Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hedges v. Hurd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1955No. 33124Published

1DissentDonworth, J.

(dissenting)—I am unable to agree with the majority in holding that there was a sufficient meeting *690of the minds of the parties to create a contract which could be the subject of an action for damages for its breach.

The earnest-money receipt and agreement which the parties signed included, in addition to the provisions described in the majority opinion, this sentence:

“The property is to be conveyed by contract for warranty deed, free of encumbrances except: Subject to mortgage hereinabove referred to.”

(The italicized words were inserted by typewriter in the printed form.)

This instrument shows…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McDonnell v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stanton v. DennisWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Weldon v. DeganWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Jammie v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API