Legal Opinion

Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC v. Sandler

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 24, 2006No. CIV.A. 3:05CV-754-HPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HEYBURN, Chief Judge.

The law firm of Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC (“Greenebaum”), the plan administrator of the firm’s Retirement Plan and Trust (the “Plan”), filed this declaratory judgment action to resolve a dispute between Debbie Sandler, the surviving spouse of a deceased Plan participant, and the decedent’s two children by a prior marriage, concerning rights to the considerable assets that the Plan Participant, David Sandler, accumulated in the Plan. 1

All discovery is now completed and this case is submitted on motions for summary judgment. For the reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1097, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23919g Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mary M. Pressley, Personal Representative for the Estate of Alvin J. Pressley, Deceased, Barbara J. PressleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Mcmillan v. ParrottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Callahan v. Hutsell, Callahan & Buchino, P.S.C.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1992
  4. Nancye Callahan v. Hutsell, Callahan & Buchino P.S.C. Revised Profit Sharing Plan, Courtney CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API