Lambert v. Paulding
New York Supreme Court
CAINES, for the plaintiffs in the first cause, moved that the sheriff ofthe county of W estchester do pay to the plaintiffs in the first suit above mentioned, or to their attorney, out of the monies in his hands, arising from the sale of the sloop Euphemia, on the executions in the above causes, the A 1 amount of the execution in the first cause.
Read the full summary
CAINES, for the plaintiffs in the first cause, moved that the sheriff ofthe county of W estchester do pay to the plaintiffs in the first suit above mentioned, or to their attorney, out of the monies in his hands, arising from the sale of the sloop Euphemia, on the executions in the above causes, the A 1 amount of the execution in the first cause. From the affidavits which were read, it appeared, that on the 11 th of Au~ gust last, a judgment was entered up against the defendant, at the suit ofthe plaintiffs in the first cause, and on the 12th of August, a fieri facias was issued thereon,…
1Per curiam
The delivery of the fi. fa. in the s<u ? f Lambert and others, against the defendant, to th*' si> of the City and County of New-York, bound the gm-ti, of the defendant, then in his bailiwick; and the pi iinni-, in that execution, cannot be deprivtd/bf the lien on the sloop, which was then lying in New York, by the act of the defendant, in removing the vessel into another county. He would be liable to an action, at the suit of the sheriff, for so removing the property. We therefore grant a rule that the sherifi of West Chester pay over to the plaintiff in the first suit, the 1,800 dollars, the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hathaway v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Marsh v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Duffy v. DawsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Patterson v. PerryThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.