Department of Corrections & Department of Public Welfare v. Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass'n
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
When it enacted Section 805 of the Public Employees Relation Act (Act 195),1 the General Assembly explicitly provided that an interest arbitration award would be “final and binding” unless it would require a “legislative enactment” to implement. The majority holds that payment of employee expenses is not a term of employment subject to collective bargaining, but that same executive members of the administration negotiating with the collective bargaining agent for the corrections officers *372can, by instigating a regulation authorized by the Administrative…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Pittsburgh Joint Collective Bargaining Committee v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Franklin County Prison Board v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.