Crisfield v. . Murdock
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made December, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, as supervisor of the town of North Dansville, brought this suit in equity to enforce the lien of the collector’s bond against the defendant J. S. Murdock as principal, and the defendants James Faulkner and Eeuben Whiteman, sureties. The defendants Hyland, Wadsworth and John N. Faulkner, being made parties as incumbrancers. On the 7th day of February, 1887, the county treasurer of Livingston county having duly extended -the time for the collection of the unpaid taxes in the town of North Dansville, the collector, with his sureties, Faulkner and Whiteman, renewed their bond in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re HoweNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Grandin v. Le Roy & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Wood v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Ray v. BirdseyeCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sherman v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Estate of KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Thompson v. DekumOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Kristiansen v. KristiansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Lopez v. McQuadeNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.