Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 2014No. 70758-2-IPublished

1ConcurrenceDwyer, J.

¶22 (concurring) I wholeheartedly agree with the majority opinion. I write separately to address two remaining, vexing issues, both of which arise from the city’s institution of its Petition Review Board.

*411¶23 At the time of the instant dispute, the city’s Petition Review Board consisted of its mayor, its city manager, and its acting police chief. Both its method of creation and its membership speak to its existence as a component of the city’s executive branch.

¶24 The relevant city ordinance provides that “[t]he Board shall consider and act upon any evidence or reports of temporary or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. PHILADELPHIA II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Eyman v. McGeheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API