Legal Opinion

People v. Verrette

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1964No. Crim. 4414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*640DEVINE, J.

On February 8, 1963, officers were watching the entrance to the premises, described below, at 1528 Haight Street, San Francisco. They commenced their vigil at about 8 p. m. It was brought out on cross-examination by counsel for appellant’s codefendant, James Wesley Fisher, that the reason for the surveillance was that the officers had information going back to 1961 that there were large quantities of marijuana being sold out of the premises, and that they had made a purchase of about a kilo of marijuana at 1528 Haight Street on January 18, 1963. The name of the 1961 informant was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Priestly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Pierson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. RiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API