Legal Opinion

State v. Fountain

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Polio District Gourt. — -Charles Hutchinson, Judge. This defendant was convicted of maintaining a liquor nuisance, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

3. Intoxicating liquors : possession of liquors : revenue stamp : presumption. The defendant, with one Roberts, was indicted, April 6, 1917, for having maintained a place wherein intoxicating liquors were sold and kept with intent to sell. Both were found guilty. Roberts was granted a new trial, and a fine of $1,000 was imposed upon defendant, Fountain.

I. He challenges the sufficiency of ihe evidence to sustain bis conviction. With one De Bolt, he operated what is known as a “Temp Bar,” at the corner of West Second Street and Grand Avenue, in the city of Des Moines, and for himself, conducted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. State v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. State v. ArlunoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. State v. MatthesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Summerhays v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API