Rosenblatt v. Baer
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
383 U.S. 75 (1966)
ROSENBLATT
v.
BAER.
No. 38.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 20, 1965.
Decided February 21, 1966.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
Arthur H. Nighswander argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Hugh H. Bownes and Conrad E. Snow.
Stanley M. Brown argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Osmond K. Fraenkel, Edward J. Ennis and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan
A jury in New Hampshire Superior Court awarded respondent damages in this civil libel action based on…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Douglas; Concurrence · Stewart; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Black; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Harlan; Dissent.
3Cases cited26 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.