Legal Opinion

Moody v. Haymarket Associates

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 28, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.

[¶ 1] Plaintiff Dan C. Moody appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Kravchuk, C.J.) after a jury verdict in favor of defendants Haymark-et Associates and Sidney Epstein, on his negligence claim. Plaintiff argues that the court abused its discretion in allowing irrelevant and prejudicial evidence of the absence of other accidents. We agree and vacate.

[¶ 2] The facts may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff Dan- C. Moody filed a complaint for injuries sustained when he fell in front of the elevator in the lobby of the Key Plaza office building in downtown…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon v. Town of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Terjelian v. Concord Group InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Budzko v. One City Center Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Merrill v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Mitchell v. KieliszekSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. Nicholas J. Capelety v. Kyla R. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API