Legal Opinion

Bruce Hermitt Bell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 2009No. 08-17012UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Petitioner Bruce Hermitt Bell, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Bell’s § 2255 motion claims his trial and appellate counsel were both ineffective as to how they handled the selection of juror Fran Milarsky at his criminal trial. After review, we affirm. 1

I. BACKGROUND

A. Trial and Direct Appeal

Petitioner Bell and his cousin, Anthony Bell, were tried together on charges of (1) conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, and (2) possession with intent to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Ford v. EstesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  3. Irvin v. Attica Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
  4. King v. Inch (Flagler County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API