Legal Opinion

Kreidler v. Mahnomen Electric Light & Power Service Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1922No. 23,139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Certiorari to review the judgment of the court below rendered in proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Decedent, the husband of plaintiff, and an employe of defendant, suffered an injury in his employment causing his death. The action was commenced to recover the compensation given by the workmen’s act, on the theory and claim that decedent was an employe of defendant at the time, both being within the statute. The issues presented by the pleadings were: (1) Whether the action was commenced within the time limited by the act; (2) whether at the time of the injury and death of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Alger v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Katzenmeier v. DoerenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Gaylord Farmers Co-operative Creamery Ass'n v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norton v. Norton Potato Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Walsh v. Flour City Ornamental Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API