Baucum v. Harper
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The rulings stated in the first nine h'eadnotes require no elaboration.
Exception is taken to the following portion of the court’s charge to the jury: “In this connection you would consider all the surrounding facts and circumstances; any statements James M. Darden may have made to Sassnett over at Jackson and at the time he put the codicil in his safety-deposit box, as to making some changes in his will; any statements he may have made to Mrs. Harper as to his will and carrying out his will; the reasons, if any are shown by the testimony, which would lead…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Marlin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Shaw v. FehnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Dickerson v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Kilgore v. NasworthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.