Legal Opinion

Strong v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 2005No. 1D05-2319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

As the Florida Parole Commission subsequently restored petitioner to supervision, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied as moot. To the extent that petitioner argues that he was never released from custody and was erroneously alleged to have violated his conditional release supervision, this issue was not presented to the circuit court and, therefore, cannot be addressed in this proceeding. See, e.g., Perez v. Winn-Dixie, 639 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Parlier v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 622 So.2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)(stating that as a general rule of appellate procedure,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parlier v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Perez v. Winn-DixieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GraysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender ReviewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API