Legal Opinion
Claim of Krebs v. Town of Ithaca
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 2002PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 23, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that apportionment did not apply to claimant’s award of workers’ compensation benefits.
After undergoing a total right hip replacement to correct a degenerative arthritic condition, claimant returned to work in a supervisory capacity, with restrictions on lifting and operating heavy equipment. He worked for approximately one year without any problem until March 1996, when he sustained a twisting injury to his right hip in a work-related accident. As a result, he was found to have a permanent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- the Claim of Carbonaro v. Chinatown Sea Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Claim of Peziol v. Vaw of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Kendle v. Colonie Masonry Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Woods v. Marriott Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by19 opinions
- Claim of Bruno v. Kelly Temp ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Scally v. Ravena Coeymans Selkirk Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Nye v. IBM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bremner v. New Venture GearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Hogan v. Hilltop Manor of NiskayunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.