Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1992No. 91-3156PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

Appellee’s motion for correction or clarification is granted. We withdraw our previous opinion filed September 11, 1992, and substitute the following therefor.

*566Appellant, Curtis Wilson Mathis, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court claiming entitlement to work and extra gain time under the holding in Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990). The trial court correctly determined that he was not entitled to relief under Waldrup for the crimes committed prior to July 1, 1978 and after June 14, 1983. The trial court also correctly determined…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Waldrup v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API