Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, Chief Judge.

The sole question to be considered in this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in granting directed verdicts in favor of the appellees. In our opinion, the trial judge improperly concluded that the evidence was not sufficient to submit the case to the jury, and accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand this action for trial on the merits.

On February 5, 1979, appellant Michael Morgan injured his cervical spine while installing an electrical conduit. Despite the discomfort he was experiencing, he continued to work for about three weeks before seeking medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walden v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Cassinelli v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Seaton v. RosenbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brodersen v. Sioux Valley Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Enslen v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Ausmus v. PierceKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Chesnut v. Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. Commonwealth, Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API