Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 2013No. 12-1320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONERY, Judge.

|TWas the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (PCF) in this particular case required to obtain a judicial ruling modifying the district court judgment prior to discontinuing payments for future medical care and related benefits that the PCF has determined are no longer necessary or actually rendered? The trial court held that it was so required, and, under the limited circumstances of this particular case, we agree.

The PCF also appeals the award of attorney fees and costs, arguing that it had good reason to discontinue payment for twenty-four hour custodial care. We affirm the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Kelty v. BrumfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  2. Farrar v. WhaleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Jordan v. Rapides Regional Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Camilla Julianna Farrar v. Linda Faye WhaleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API