State v. Barber
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
Robert E. Barber appeals his jury trial conviction for criminal possession of a firearm. On appeal, Barber argues that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that to convict, all of the jurors had to agree that the same underlying criminal act had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt and further erred in omitting an element of the crime from the elements instruction.
We reverse and remand for new trial, because it is not possible to conclude the jury rendered a unanimous verdict based upon the same underlying act of possession.
The State's evidence was that Barber, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. VoylesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. ZabrinasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. HookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. StaggsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.