Casey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Melvin Casey (a/k/a Torrey Shields), entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) (D.C.Code § 33 — 541(d) (1998)). Casey argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. Preliminarily, the government argues that Casey is precluded from appealing because he failed to preserve properly his appeal rights pursuant to Super. Ct.Crim. R. 11. We conclude that Casey adequately preserved the issue for appeal, and we affirm.
I
The government argues that Casey is precluded from contesting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bernard West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Beachum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.