Florsheim v. Patterson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The plaintiff and one Reinberger are the owners of lands which together constitute a peninsula extending westerly into Lake Shishebogama, located in both Vilas and Oneida counties. Reinberger’s lands, which are used for resort purposes, are situated in the southwesterly part of the peninsula and wholly within the town of Minocqua, in Oneida county. Reinberger’s lands do not *591abut on any highway and sole access to them is by means of a right of way by necessity which runs westerly through plaintiff’s farm from a north-and-south highway. See Florsheim v. Reinberger, 173 Wis. 150, 179 N. W. 793,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Judd v. Town of Fox LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Sage v. Town of FifieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Harley v. LindemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Smart v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Flanders v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.