Aluminum Products Co. v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $485.29 for goods sold and delivered. The answer set up counterclaims for $447.31. The case was tried before Montgomery, J., who at the close of the testimony directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $326.10, with interest. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
At the close of the testimony the trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $326.10 with interest. The jury returned its verdict as instructed, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of aluminum ware. Defendant lives in Minneapolis, and, in the years 1914 and 1915, was plaintiff’s agent for the sale of its goods to the trade in Minnesota and Iowa, under a contract the material parts of which are as follows:
“We hereby appoint you exclusive representative for the sale of our product in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blumenthal v. BridgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Dole v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Garfield v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- W. G. Taylor Co. v. BannermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Golden Gate Packing Co. v. Farmers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.