Legal Opinion

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1983No. 8227SC464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in (1) failing to conduct a jury instruction conference as required by Rule 21, (2) instructing the jury on defendant’s failure to testify and (3) imposing an improper sentence.

The trial judge failed to conduct a jury instruction conference and the defendant failed to request one. Then the trial judge, without a request from defendant, gave the following disputed charge:

Now ladies and gentlemen, . . . the Court will instruct you further, the defendant, Raymond Morris, has not gone on the witness stand and testified during this trial.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SwinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API