Legal Opinion
California Ex Rel. Harris v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2015No. 12-71958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Petitioners, the people of the state of California through their Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, the California Public Utilities Commission, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, and Southern California Edison (“the California Parties”), seek review of a series of orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “the Commission”) on remand following our decision in California ex rel. Lockyer v. FERC (“Lockyer”), 383 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.2004). There, we held that FERC may authorize market-based energy tariffs, so long as that regulatory framework…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- California State Water Resourc v. FercCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022