Legal Opinion

State v. Morehead

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 21, 1900Published

Indictment charging a common nuisance.-' The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Tillinghast, J.(1) The defendant, who has been convicted of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance in the town of Coventry, now petitions for a new trial on the ground of certain alleged erroneous rulings of the justice who presided at the trial, and also on the ground that the verdict is against the evidence. The indictment charges the keeping of a liquor nuisance. At the trial of the case it was agreed that the defendant had a license for the sale of intoxicating liquors in said town during all of the time covered by the testimony introduced by the State. In view of this fact, and of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCauleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Commonwealth v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. State v. CoombsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  5. State v. MaherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API