United States v. Christopher Mateen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion, in which COLE, C.J., and BOGGS,
BATCHELDER, MOORE, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ„ joined, and CLAY, J. joined in the result. CLAY, J. (pp. 633-36), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
2Per curiam
The federal statutes prohibiting the sale, distribution, and possession of child pornography include sentencing-enhancement provisions that apply to recidivist offenders who have also been convicted of certain predicate state and federal offenses. Christopher Mateen pleaded guilty to…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Frederick C. RezinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Timmy FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Idris Quintell WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- John Penfound v. David RuskinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Idris Quintell WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Herr v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.