Legal Opinion

Barges Cycle Co. v. Schofield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 9, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. September term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

1. An instrument in the form of a contract between two parties, signed by one of them and by an agent of the other, with a clause reciting that “this contract shall not be considered as binding upon the first party until, approved in writing by” the second party, is only a proposal to contract, submitted by the party of the first part to the party of the second part.

2. When, before approval of the proposed contract by the latter, a third person for a valid consideration paid by the party of the first part enters in writing upon such proposal a stipulation that he will “guarantee all sums…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. B. Claflin & Co. v. BriantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Sanders v. EtchersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peck v. Precision Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Brown Grocery Co. v. Planters BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Hartsfield Co. v. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Royal Cigar Co. v. HuietSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Asmussen v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API