Legal Opinion

Hidden Springs Winery, Inc. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 6, 1987No. 85-T-163; CA A40545Published

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Employment Division which determined that, for employment tax purposes, petitioner is a subject employer with respect to its winemaking activities. We affirm.

We take our facts from the referee’s opinion. Petitioner is a “Subchapter S” corporation. Its stated purpose is “to operate a winery and to engage in any other lawful activity whatsoever.” Petitioner leases two acres of land, including the winery and a 1.5-acre prune orchard. The winery produces about 7,000 gallons of wine annually. Don Byard and his wife and Alvin Alexanderson and his wife are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saxon v. Division of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. MalinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Naumes of Oregon, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Miranda v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Growers Refrigerating Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API