Hendrie v. Berkowitz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, C. J.:
Defendants Ney and Berkowitz were partners in the business of manufacturing and selling women’s cloaks and mantillas, under the name and style of J. L. Ney & Co. The business did not extend to other matters. On the 17th of September, 1866, George W. Ward, for the purpose of raising money for his own use, executed a promissory note for *116two thousand dollars, and interest at one and a quarter per cent per month, payable thirty days after date, to the order of J. L. Ney & Co., which note Ney, at Ward’s request, for his accommodation, and without the knowledge or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gansevoort v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Bank of Rochester v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Williams v. WalbridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- New-York Firemen Insurance Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Boyd v. PlumbNew York Supreme Court · 1831
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Park Bank v. German-American Mutual Warehousing & Security Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Nat. Park Bk. v. . G.A.M.W. S. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lyon, Potter & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Sioux CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Mechanics' Bank v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Allen, Nugent & Co. v. CarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.