Legal Opinion

Riley-Stoker v. Pearson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 1987No. BS-219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge.

Petitioners have filed their petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A) and 9.100(c) to review a workers’ compensation order which (1) granted claimant’s motion to change venue over petitioners’ objections and (2) consolidated into one final hearing in Tampa his two claims against petitioners pending in District E with his two prior claims against other parties pending in District D. We have jurisdiction to grant the writ and quash the order. Hoboken Drywall Co. v. Telfair, 417 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Claimant, while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoboken Drywall Co. v. TelfairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Sherertz v. Key West Oceanside MarinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HINES ELEC. v. McClureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Lockheed Space Operations v. PhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Feldman v. Villa Regina Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API