Legal Opinion

Erazo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 2004No. 2206-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

144 S.W.3d 487 (2004)

Alex ERAZO, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas.

No. 2206-02.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 16, 2004.

Douglas M. Durham, Houston, for Appellant.

Alan Curry, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin.

OPINION

PRICE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Yet those words, in the context of a criminal trial, must be the right words. Otherwise, the picture from whence the words flow is inadmissible. A photograph is inadmissible under Rule of Evidence 403 if…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Erazo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Sonnier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API