Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lockert v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1999No. 25A03-9810-CR-449Published

1DissentBailey, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The right of an accused to a speedy trial is a fundamental principle of constitutional law guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, § 12 of the Indiana Constitution. Crawford v. State, 669 N.E.2d 141, 145 (Ind.1996); Clark v. State, 659 N.E.2d 548, 551 (Ind.1995). The most fundamental consideration underlying the right to a speedy trial is that the State can neither incarcerate an accused, nor hold a pending charge over the defendant’s head, indefinitely. Poore v. State, 685 N.E.2d 36, 40 (Ind.1997). In other words, no…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API