Legal Opinion

United States v. Marshall Dewayne Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1987No. 86-1478PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

Marshall Williams appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. Williams presents two constitutional claims. He first argues that the district court should have held a competency hearing. Williams also argues that he was in fact incompetent. Although similar, those two claims involve two separate rights, one procedural and the other substantive. The district court analyzed and rejected both claims. We affirm.

In June 1984, a federal grand jury indicted Williams for the murder of his stepfather. In July 1984 and before Williams’ trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Maggio v. FulfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Robert E. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nguyen v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Thomas Joe Miller-El v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API