Castillo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESQUIVEL, Justice.
MOTION TO RECONSIDER APPELLEES’ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AFFIRM THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT
Before discussing the merits of this case, we must consider the appellees’ motion to dismiss or in the alternative affirm the judgment of the trial court. Appellees contend that the appellants’ brief was not filed within the required thirty (30) day period immediately following the filing of the Transcript as prescribed by Rule 414. 1 Appellants also had not filed a Motion to Extend Time for filing the Appellants’ Brief until forty-seven (47) days after…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Mellon Mortgage Co. v. HolderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Wright v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.