Legal Opinion

Buck v. Mueller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages for breach of a covenant in an executed lease granting him an option to release the property of the defendant.

The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it is pertinent to this opinion, alleges the following:

“V.
“On or about August 1, 1952, and more than 90 days prior to the expiration of said lease, plaintiff exercised his said option to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harlow v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Dellwo v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nigro v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Terminal Restaurant, Inc. v. Binkow, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API