Legal Opinion

Nasir v. Gwinnett County State Court

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 2017No. A16A1611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Presiding Judge.

Hamidullah Nasir filed a pro se action and named as defendants the Gwinnett County State Court, the Gwinnett County Solicitor-General, and the Gwinnett County Police Department (collectively, “the defendants”), seeking restriction of access to his criminal record under OCGA § 35-3-37 and monetary damages for civil rights violations under 42 USC §§ 1983, 1985, and 2000d in connection with the proceedings that led to his criminal record. The trial court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim. We affirm, because Nasir was not entitled to restriction of access…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Rozar v. MullisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Northway v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. Craigo v. AziziCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Doe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. AUSTIN v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Carl Gardei v. R. L. "Butch" ConwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  4. Demetrius Dewayne Ledbetter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Luke Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API