Legal Opinion

Talley v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants summary judgment because plaintiffs failed to raise an issue of fact in response to defendants’ showing that the use of the disputed property was not open and notorious, continuous and uninterrupted for the prescriptive period (see, Reed v Piedimonte, 138 AD2d 937, lv denied 72 NY2d 803). Plaintiffs also failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits and therefore were not entitled to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Reed v. PiedimonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MonsterHut, Inc. v. PaeTec Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API