Legal Opinion

IPCom GMBH & Co. KG v. Apple Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2014No. Case No. 5:14-mc-80037-EJD-PSGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(Re: Docket No. 7)

ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE

PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge

Before the court is Apple Inc.’s motion to quash IPCom GMBH & Co. KG’s subpoena for Apple’s license agreements, which was served pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782.1 The matter was submitted without oral argument pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the papers, the court DENIES Apple’s motion to quash.

I. BACKGROUND

On March 2, -2012, IPCom filed an infringement action against Apple in Germany, asserting European patent EP 1 841 268.2 On May 7, 2013, IPCom amended its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. Heraeus Kulzer GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of RSM Production Corp. v. Noble Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  2. In re: Letter of Request from the Local Court in Pankow, GermanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  3. Jones v. PGA Tour, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. IPCom GmbH & Co., KGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. IPCom GmbH & Co., KGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API