Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Calhoun

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1985No. 8412SC1330PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

In this action by the estate of John R. Calhoun, deceased, to recover the unpaid balance of alleged loans made by John R. Calhoun to his nephew, John S. Calhoun, we must determine the propriety of the trial court’s judgment granting defendants’ Rule 50 motion for a directed verdict. The only evidence presented by the plaintiffs in this case was the testimony of the defendant-nephew, John S. Calhoun (nephew).

The purpose of a motion for a directed verdict under Rule 50 of the Rules of Civil Procedure is to test the legal sufficiency of the non-movant’s evidence to take the case to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Teele v. KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Helms v. PrikopaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Industrial Distributors, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hatem v. BryanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Odom v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API