Legal Opinion

Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. McClinton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 19007. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This is an action for the recovery of money advanced on contracts for the sale of hay, and for damages for breach of such contracts.

The defendant interposed an affirmative defense, asking that the contracts in issue be reformed to show that they were contracts of agency, and asked for damages by reason of a breach thereof by plaintiff. At the close of plaintiff’s case, after motion by defendant for judgment, plaintiff moved for voluntary non-suit. The record is not clear as to what was the ruling of the trial court upon this question at that time, but, in any event, the case proceeded to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n v. SaundersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. McClaskey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. E. E. Harkins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API