Legal Opinion
United States v. Nickolas Frol
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1975No. 75-1016PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.
Nickolas Frol was convicted of unlawful possession of heroin with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. In this appeal, he contends that prejudicial hearsay statements of an alleged accomplice were erroneously admitted at his trial and that the evidence presented against him was insufficient to warrant a finding of guilt.
The government’s evidence may be summarized as follows: in early 1974, Agent Donald Bloch, of the Drug Enforcement Administration, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Obadiah StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Curtis Charles Overshon and John OvershonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Robert Kenneth Rich, United States of America v. Larry J. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Katherine BuckhanonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.