Legal Opinion
Poole v. City of Pearl
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2005No. 2002-AN-02139-SCTPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
908 So.2d 728 (2005)
In the Matter of the Extension of the Boundaries of the City of Pearl, Mississippi: Carol POOLE, Robert Pitts, et al.
v.
CITY OF PEARL, Mississippi.
No. 2002-AN-02139-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
August 11, 2005.
James H. Herring, attorney for appellants.
Jerry L. Mills, Ridgeland, James A. Bobo, Brandon, attorneys for appellee.
EN BANC.
DICKINSON, Justice, for the Court:
¶ 1. Today, we review yet another vigorously contested annexation effort by one of our municipalities. Perhaps no area of the law generates more emotional participation by members of the public. The idea of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Enlargement of Yazoo City v. Yazoo CityMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of Boundaries of City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Extension of Boundaries of ColumbusMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- McElhaney v. City of Horn LakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Extension of Boundaries of City of RidgelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Extension of Boundaries of City of Tupelo v. City of TupeloMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Boundaries of City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Enlarging City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Coahoma County, Mississippi v. City of Clarksdale, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.